Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
VS
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
VS
NVIDIA GeForce MX330

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Quadro RTX 8000 Passive  vs  NVIDIA GeForce MX330.

not rated
Place in performance rating
415
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
no data
Code name
GP108
no data
Type
Laptop
13 August 2018 (3 years ago)
Release date
20 February 2020 (1 year ago)
$9,999
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$5599 (0.6x MSRP)
Price now
$1079
no data
Value for money
2.58
TU102
GPU code name
N17S-LP / N17S-G3
Workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Quadro RTX 8000 Passive  vs  NVIDIA GeForce MX330 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
384
no data
Core clock speed
1531 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
no data
Transistor count
1,800 million
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
10 Watt
466.6
Texture fill rate
38.26
4608
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
1620 MHz
Boost clock speed
1594 MHz
18,600 million
Number of transistors
1,800 million
260 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
10 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
267 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330.

GDDR6
Memory type
GDDR5
48 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
14000 MHz
Memory clock speed
7000 MHz
672.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
48.06 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330.

4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
Multi Monitor
+
no data
GPU Boost
+
7.5
CUDA
6.1
no data
Optimus
+
no data
GameWorks
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 Ultimate (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2.131
Vulkan
1.2.131
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Quadro RTX 8000 Passive or NVIDIA GeForce MX330 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 27 13 11 9
Death Stranding (2020) Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 33.4 14.7 13.7 13.4
F1 2020 (2020) Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 81 39 28 16
Gears Tactics (2020) Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 94.6 34.5 22.1 15.9
Doom Eternal (2020) Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 35.3
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 16 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (48 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (672.0 GB/s vs 48.06 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX330

13.64% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($1079 vs $5599 (0.6x MSRP))

Multi Monitor

So, Quadro RTX 8000 Passive or NVIDIA GeForce MX330?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce MX330 .

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive versus NVIDIA GeForce MX330 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.3 Out of 7 Hitesti Score
3.9 Out of 180 Hitesti Score