NVIDIA T400
VS
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
NVIDIA T400
VS
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA T400  vs  Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600.

340
Place in performance rating
not rated
Turing
Architecture
PowerVR SGX5
6 May 2021 (less than a year ago)
Release date
1 May 2010 (11 years ago)
$24
Price now
no data
2.45
Value for money
no data
TU117
GPU code name
GMA 600
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA T400  vs  Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Core clock speed
400 MHz
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
45 nm
34.20
Texture fill rate
no data
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
4
1425 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
4,700 million
Number of transistors
no data
30 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA T400 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA T400 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600.

GDDR6
Memory type
no data
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
64 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
10 GB/s
Memory clock speed
no data
80 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA T400 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600.

3x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA T400 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
DirectX 9.0c, Shader 3.0

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA T400 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA T400 or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA T400
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA T400
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA T400
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA T400
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA T400
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA T400

13.93% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 45 nm)

Advantages of Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

There is no accountable advantage

So, NVIDIA T400 or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA T400 .

NVIDIA T400 versus Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3448 (100 %)

User rating

4.0 Out of 34 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score