NVIDIA T1000
VS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
NVIDIA T1000
VS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA T1000  vs  Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition.

184
Place in performance rating
not rated
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
6 May 2021 (less than a year ago)
Release date
27 September 2008 (13 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$699
$13.21
Price now
no data
34.44
Value for money
no data
TU117
GPU code name
G84
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA T1000  vs  Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Core clock speed
520 MHz
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
80 nm
78.12
Texture fill rate
8.320
no data
Floating-point performance
66.56 gflops
896
Pipelines / CUDA cores
32
1395 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
4,700 million
Number of transistors
289 million
50 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
42 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA T1000 and Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
no data
Length
168 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA T1000 vs Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition.

GDDR6
Memory type
GDDR3
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
10 GB/s
Memory clock speed
1300 MHz
160.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
20.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA T1000 vs Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition.

4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
1.1

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA T1000 and Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
no data
OpenGL
3.3
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
4.0
no data
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA T1000 and Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA T1000 or Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA T1000
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA T1000
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA T1000
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA T1000
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA T1000
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA T1000

29.45% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 80 nm)

More memory bandwidth (160.0 GB/s vs 20.8 GB/s)

Advantages of Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 4 GB)

So, NVIDIA T1000 or Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA T1000 .

NVIDIA T1000 versus Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

7586 (100 %)

User rating

5.0 Out of 8 Hitesti Score
2.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score