NVIDIA RTX A2000
VS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
NVIDIA RTX A2000
VS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA RTX A2000  vs  Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640.

65
Place in performance rating
541
Ampere
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
no data
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
no data
Type
Laptop
10 August 2021 (less than a year ago)
Release date
3 January 2017 (4 years ago)
$449
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$2680 (6x MSRP)
Price now
$669
4.75
Value for money
1.45
GA106
GPU code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA RTX A2000  vs  Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
384
no data
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
no data
Transistor count
189 million
8 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
124.8
Texture fill rate
52.80
3328
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
1200 MHz
Boost clock speed
1050 MHz
13,250 million
Number of transistors
189 million
70 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA RTX A2000 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 4.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
167 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640.

GDDR6
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
6 GB
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
192 Bit
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
12 GB/s
Memory clock speed
no data
288.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640.

4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA RTX A2000 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
12 (12_1)
no data
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.1.103
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA RTX A2000 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA RTX A2000 or Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA RTX A2000
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA RTX A2000
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA RTX A2000
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA RTX A2000
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA RTX A2000
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA RTX A2000

47.09% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (8 nm vs 14 nm)

Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

Cheaper ($669 vs $2680 (6x MSRP))

More maximum RAM amount (32 GB vs 6 GB)

So, NVIDIA RTX A2000 or Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA RTX A2000 .

NVIDIA RTX A2000 versus Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

14394 (100 %)

User rating

4.1 Out of 16 Hitesti Score
3.4 Out of 52 Hitesti Score