NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
VS
Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
VS
Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile  vs  Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP.

362
Place in performance rating
not rated
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
Release date
28 June 2007 (14 years ago)
no data
Price now
$25
TU117
GPU code name
RV610
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile  vs  Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1365 MHz
Core clock speed
525 MHz
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
94.92
Texture fill rate
2.100
no data
Floating-point performance
42 gflops
896
Pipelines / CUDA cores
40
1695 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
4,700 million
Number of transistors
180 million
18 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
20 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile and Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
AGP 8x
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
medium sized
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP.

GDDR5/GDDR6
Memory type
DDR2
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
10000 MHz
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
80 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile and Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
no data
OpenGL
3.3
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
4.0
no data
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile and Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile or Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile

12.74% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 65 nm)

More memory bandwidth (80 GB/s vs 6.4 GB/s)

Advantages of Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 4 GB)

So, NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile or Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile .

NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile versus Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.0 Out of 33 Hitesti Score
3.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score