NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
VS
Matrox Millennium G200A
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
VS
Matrox Millennium G200A

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile  vs  Matrox Millennium G200A.

362
Place in performance rating
not rated
Turing
Architecture
G200
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
Release date
1999 (22 years ago)
TU117
GPU code name
Calao
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile  vs  Matrox Millennium G200A in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1365 MHz
Core clock speed
84 MHz
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
250 nm
94.92
Texture fill rate
0.08
896
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
1695 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
4,700 million
Number of transistors
10 million
18 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile and Matrox Millennium G200A come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCI
no data
Length
150 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
medium sized
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile vs Matrox Millennium G200A.

GDDR5/GDDR6
Memory type
SDR
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
8 MB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
10000 MHz
Memory clock speed
112 MHz
80 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
896.0 MB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile vs Matrox Millennium G200A.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x VGA

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile and Matrox Millennium G200A is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
5.0
no data
OpenGL
None
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
OpenCL
None

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile and Matrox Millennium G200A graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile or Matrox Millennium G200A good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Matrox Millennium G200A
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Matrox Millennium G200A
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Matrox Millennium G200A
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Matrox Millennium G200A
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Matrox Millennium G200A
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile

12.74% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 250 nm)

Advantages of Matrox Millennium G200A

More maximum RAM amount (8 MB vs 4 GB)

More memory bandwidth (896.0 MB/s vs 80 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile or Matrox Millennium G200A?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile .

NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile versus Matrox Millennium G200A performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.0 Out of 33 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score