NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
VS
Matrox QID LP PCI
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
VS
Matrox QID LP PCI

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile  vs  Matrox QID LP PCI.

181
Place in performance rating
not rated
Turing
Architecture
MP
12 April 2021 (less than a year ago)
Release date
17 December 2004 (16 years ago)
TU117
GPU code name
MP-A4
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile  vs  Matrox QID LP PCI in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Core clock speed
250 MHz
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
0 nm
91.20
Texture fill rate
2.000
1024
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
1425 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
4,700 million
Number of transistors
no data
18 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and Matrox QID LP PCI come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCI-X
no data
Length
168 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
medium sized
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Matrox QID LP PCI.

GDDR6
Memory type
DDR
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
12000 MHz
Memory clock speed
600 MHz
160.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
4.8 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Matrox QID LP PCI.

No outputs
Display Connectors
2x LFH60

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and Matrox QID LP PCI is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
8.1
no data
OpenGL
1.5
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and Matrox QID LP PCI graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile or Matrox QID LP PCI good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Matrox QID LP PCI
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Matrox QID LP PCI
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Matrox QID LP PCI
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Matrox QID LP PCI
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Matrox QID LP PCI
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

29.87% faster in synthetic tests

More memory bandwidth (160.0 GB/s vs 4.8 GB/s)

Advantages of Matrox QID LP PCI

More maximum RAM amount (128 MB vs 4 GB)

So, NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile or Matrox QID LP PCI?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile .

NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile versus Matrox QID LP PCI performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.5 Out of 24 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score