NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
VS
FireGL X2-256
NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
VS
FireGL X2-256

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000  vs  FireGL X2-256.

11
Place in performance rating
not rated
Ampere
Architecture
Rage 9
5 October 2020 (1 year ago)
Release date
1 March 2003 (18 years ago)
$4,649
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$10208 (2.2x MSRP)
Price now
no data
0.81
Value for money
no data
GA102
GPU code name
R360
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000  vs  FireGL X2-256 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1410 MHz
Core clock speed
380 MHz
8 nm
Manufacturing process technology
150 nm
625.0
Texture fill rate
3.040
10752
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
1800 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
28,300 million
Number of transistors
117 million
300 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000 and FireGL X2-256 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 4.0 x16
Interface
AGP 8x
267 mm
Length
no data
8-pin EPS
Supplementary power connectors
1x Molex

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000 vs FireGL X2-256.

GDDR6
Memory type
DDR2
48 GB
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
16000 MHz
Memory clock speed
700 MHz
768.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
22.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000 vs FireGL X2-256.

4x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000 and FireGL X2-256 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
9.0
no data
OpenGL
2.0
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000 and FireGL X2-256 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000 or FireGL X2-256 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
FireGL X2-256
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
FireGL X2-256
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
FireGL X2-256
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
FireGL X2-256
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
FireGL X2-256
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000

79.43% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (8 nm vs 150 nm)

More memory bandwidth (768.0 GB/s vs 22.4 GB/s)

Advantages of FireGL X2-256

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 48 GB)

So, NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000 or FireGL X2-256?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000 .

NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000 versus FireGL X2-256 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

2.4 Out of 200 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score