NVIDIA Quadro P620
VS
GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
NVIDIA Quadro P620
VS
GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro P620  vs  GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel.

323
Place in performance rating
not rated
22.11
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
GP107
Code name
no data
Mobile workstation
Type
no data
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
Release date
3 June 2008 (13 years ago)
$170
Price now
no data
36.28
Value for money
no data
GP107
GPU code name
C79
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro P620  vs  GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

512
Pipelines
no data
1177 MHz
Core clock speed
400 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
3,300 million
Transistor count
no data
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
40 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
43.33
Texture fill rate
3.200
1,490 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
512
Pipelines / CUDA cores
16
1442 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
3,300 million
Number of transistors
314 million
40 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
12 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro P620 and GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
145 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
large
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel.

GDDR5
Memory type
System Shared
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
6000 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
80.13 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel.

4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
Multi Monitor
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro P620 and GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
+
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
4.0
no data
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro P620 and GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro P620 or GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro P620
GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro P620
GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro P620
GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro P620
GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro P620
GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P620

17.83% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 65 nm)

Multi Monitor

Advantages of GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel

There is no accountable advantage

So, NVIDIA Quadro P620 or GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro P620 .

NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

310112 (100 %)

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Maya: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Maya test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Creo: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Creo test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Catia: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Catia test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.2 Out of 57 Hitesti Score
3.5 Out of 2 Hitesti Score