NVIDIA Quadro M620
VS
AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro M620
VS
AMD Cypress

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro M620  vs  AMD Cypress.

388
Place in performance rating
not rated
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale 2
no data
Code name
Cypress
Mobile workstation
Type
Desktop
13 January 2017 (4 years ago)
Release date
no data
$1958
Price now
$12.72
1.59
Value for money
no data
GM107
GPU code name
Cypress
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro M620  vs  AMD Cypress in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

512
Pipelines
1600
1018 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
no data
Transistor count
2,154 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
30 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
31.26
Texture fill rate
no data
512
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1600
977 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
1,870 million
Number of transistors
2,154 million
30 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro M620 and AMD Cypress come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

MXM-A (3.0)
Interface
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
large
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro M620 vs AMD Cypress.

GDDR5
Memory type
no data
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
5012 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
80 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro M620 vs AMD Cypress.

No outputs
Display Connectors
no data
1.2
Display Port
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

5.0
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data
+
3D Vision Pro
no data
+
3D Stereo
no data
+
Mosaic
no data
+
nView Display Management
no data
+
nView
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro M620 and AMD Cypress is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.5
OpenGL
4.4
1.1.126
Vulkan
no data
5.0
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro M620 and AMD Cypress graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro M620 or AMD Cypress good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M620
AMD Cypress
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M620
AMD Cypress
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M620
AMD Cypress
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M620
AMD Cypress
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M620
AMD Cypress
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M620

12.74% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

Advantages of AMD Cypress

Cheaper ($12.72 vs $1958)

More pipelines (1600 vs 512)

So, NVIDIA Quadro M620 or AMD Cypress?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro M620 .

NVIDIA Quadro M620 versus AMD Cypress performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Medical: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Medical test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Maya: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Maya test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Energy: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Energy test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Creo: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Creo test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Catia: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Catia test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

2.0 Out of 10 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score