NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
VS
AMD Caicos
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
VS
AMD Caicos

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro K1000M  vs  AMD Caicos.

726
Place in performance rating
not rated
12.66
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GK107
Code name
Caicos
Mobile workstation
Type
Desktop
1 June 2012 (9 years ago)
Release date
no data
$119.90
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$232 (1.9x MSRP)
Price now
$10.38
0.25
Value for money
no data
N14P-Q1
GPU code name
Caicos
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro K1000M  vs  AMD Caicos in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

192
Pipelines
160
850 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
1,270 million
Transistor count
370 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
45 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
13.60
Texture fill rate
no data
326.4 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
192
Pipelines / CUDA cores
160
1,270 million
Number of transistors
370 million
45 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro K1000M and AMD Caicos come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

MXM-A (3.0)
Interface
no data
medium sized
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs AMD Caicos.

DDR3
Memory type
no data
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
28.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs AMD Caicos.

No outputs
Display Connectors
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro K1000M and AMD Caicos is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
+
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K1000M and AMD Caicos graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M or AMD Caicos good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
AMD Caicos
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
AMD Caicos
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
AMD Caicos
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
AMD Caicos
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
AMD Caicos
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

4.58% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (192 vs 160)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

Advantages of AMD Caicos

Cheaper ($10.38 vs $232 (1.9x MSRP))

So, NVIDIA Quadro K1000M or AMD Caicos?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K1000M .

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M versus AMD Caicos performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.6 Out of 11 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score