NVIDIA Quadro 6000
VS
3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
NVIDIA Quadro 6000
VS
3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro 6000  vs  3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI.

405
Place in performance rating
not rated
0.78
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Fermi
Architecture
no data
GF100
Code name
no data
Workstation
Type
no data
10 December 2010 (10 years ago)
Release date
1 March 1997 (24 years ago)
$4,399
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$2259 (0.5x MSRP)
Price now
no data
0.36
Value for money
no data
GF100
GPU code name
Rage Pro Turbo
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro 6000  vs  3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

448
Pipelines
no data
574 MHz
Core clock speed
75 MHz
3,100 million
Transistor count
no data
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
350 nm
204 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
32.14
Texture fill rate
0.08
1,027.7 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
448
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
3,100 million
Number of transistors
8 million
204 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro 6000 and 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCI
248 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI.

GDDR5
Memory type
SDR
6 GB
Maximum RAM amount
8 MB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
2988 MHz
Memory clock speed
75 MHz
143.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
600 MB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI.

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
1x DB13W3

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro 6000 and 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
no data
OpenCL
None

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro 6000 and 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro 6000 or 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 6000
3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 6000
3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 6000
3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 6000
3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 6000
3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 6000

14.01% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 350 nm)

Advantages of 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI

More maximum RAM amount (8 MB vs 6 GB)

More memory bandwidth (600 MB/s vs 143.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro 6000 or 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro 6000 .

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 versus 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 9 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score