NVIDIA Quadro 2000
VS
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
VS
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro 2000  vs  ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition.

671
Place in performance rating
2248
10.74
Value for money (0-100)
0.11
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GF106
Code name
Madison
Workstation
Type
Desktop
24 December 2010 (10 years ago)
Release date
22 April 2010
$599
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$89 (0.1x MSRP)
Price now
$244
0.69
Value for money
no data
GF106
GPU code name
no data
Workstation
Market segment
no data

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro 2000  vs  ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

192
Pipelines
400
625 MHz
Core clock speed
650 MHz
1,170 million
Transistor count
627 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
62 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
20.00
Texture fill rate
13.00
480.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
520.0 gflops
192
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
1,170 million
Number of transistors
no data
62 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
178 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR3
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
2600 MHz
Memory clock speed
1590 MHz
41.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
25.44 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition.

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro 2000 or ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 2000
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 2000

4.24% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($89 (0.1x MSRP) vs $244)

More memory bandwidth (41.6 GB/s vs 25.44 GB/s)

Advantages of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition

More pipelines (400 vs 192)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 62 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 1 GB)

So, NVIDIA Quadro 2000 or ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro 2000 .

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 versus ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition performance benchmarks comparison

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.5 Out of 27 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score