NVIDIA NVS 3100M
VS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
NVIDIA NVS 3100M
VS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA NVS 3100M  vs  Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition.

1029
Place in performance rating
not rated
GT2xx
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
7 January 2010 (11 years ago)
Release date
11 November 2008 (13 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,799
$269
Price now
no data
0.01
Value for money
no data
N10M-NS
GPU code name
GT200B
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA NVS 3100M  vs  Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

600 MHz
Core clock speed
602 MHz
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
4.848
Texture fill rate
38.53
46.98 gflops
Floating-point performance
462.3 gflops
16
Pipelines / CUDA cores
192
260 million
Number of transistors
1,400 million
14 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
150 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA NVS 3100M and Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA NVS 3100M vs Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition.

GDDR3, DDR3
Memory type
GDDR3
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
384 Bit
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
12.64 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA NVS 3100M vs Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition.

No outputs
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
1.3

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA NVS 3100M and Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
no data
OpenGL
3.3
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
4.0
no data
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA NVS 3100M and Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA NVS 3100M or Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA NVS 3100M
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA NVS 3100M
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA NVS 3100M
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA NVS 3100M
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA NVS 3100M
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA NVS 3100M

1.77% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 55 nm)

Advantages of Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

More maximum RAM amount (1536 MB vs 512 MB)

More memory bandwidth (76.8 GB/s vs 12.64 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA NVS 3100M or Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA NVS 3100M .

NVIDIA NVS 3100M versus Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.2 Out of 28 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score