NVIDIA NVS 300
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
NVIDIA NVS 300
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 2000

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA NVS 300  vs  NVIDIA Quadro 2000.

not rated
Place in performance rating
671
no data
Value for money (0-100)
10.74
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
no data
Code name
GF106
no data
Type
Workstation
8 January 2011 (10 years ago)
Release date
24 December 2010 (10 years ago)
$109
Launch price (MSRP)
$599
$36 (0.3x MSRP)
Price now
$89 (0.1x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.69
GT218
GPU code name
GF106
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA NVS 300  vs  NVIDIA Quadro 2000 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
192
520 MHz
Core clock speed
625 MHz
no data
Transistor count
1,170 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
62 Watt
4.160
Texture fill rate
20.00
39.36 gflops
Floating-point performance
480.0 gflops
16
Pipelines / CUDA cores
192
260 million
Number of transistors
1,170 million
18 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
62 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA NVS 300 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
145 mm
Length
178 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000.

DDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1580 MHz
Memory clock speed
2600 MHz
12.64 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
41.6 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000.

1x DMS-59
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA NVS 300 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
12 (11_0)
no data
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA NVS 300 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA NVS 300 or NVIDIA Quadro 2000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA NVS 300
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA NVS 300
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA NVS 300
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA NVS 300
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA NVS 300
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA NVS 300

6.65% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($36 (0.3x MSRP) vs $89 (0.1x MSRP))

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 1 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 2000

More memory bandwidth (41.6 GB/s vs 12.64 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA NVS 300 or NVIDIA Quadro 2000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA NVS 300 .

NVIDIA NVS 300 versus NVIDIA Quadro 2000 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 10 Hitesti Score
3.5 Out of 27 Hitesti Score