NVIDIA GeForce 820M
VS
AMD FirePro S9050
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
VS
AMD FirePro S9050

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GeForce 820M  vs  AMD FirePro S9050.

850
Place in performance rating
308
no data
Value for money (0-100)
0.12
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GF117
Code name
Tahiti
Laptop
Type
Workstation
7 January 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
7 August 2014 (7 years ago)
$490
Price now
$550
0.05
Value for money
4.40
N15V-GM
GPU code name
Tahiti
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GeForce 820M  vs  AMD FirePro S9050 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

96
Pipelines
1792
775 MHz
Core clock speed
900 MHz
585 million
Transistor count
4,313 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
10.00
Texture fill rate
100.8
240.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
96
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1792
585 million
Number of transistors
4,313 million
15 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
225 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce 820M and AMD FirePro S9050 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
254 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
PCI Express 2.0
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
full height / full length

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs AMD FirePro S9050.

DDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
384 Bit
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
14.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs AMD FirePro S9050.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

2.0
GPU Boost
no data
+
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data
+
GameWorks
no data
+
Verde Drivers
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GeForce 820M and AMD FirePro S9050 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.5
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce 820M and AMD FirePro S9050 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce 820M or AMD FirePro S9050 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 820M
AMD FirePro S9050
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 820M
AMD FirePro S9050
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 820M
AMD FirePro S9050
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 820M
AMD FirePro S9050
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 820M
AMD FirePro S9050
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 820M

2.24% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($490 vs $550)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 225 Watt)

Advantages of AMD FirePro S9050

More pipelines (1792 vs 96)

More maximum RAM amount (12 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (264 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce 820M or AMD FirePro S9050?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce 820M .

NVIDIA GeForce 820M versus AMD FirePro S9050 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.8 Out of 65 Hitesti Score
4.5 Out of 2 Hitesti Score