NVIDIA GeForce 305M
VS
RSX Reality Synthesizer
NVIDIA GeForce 305M
VS
RSX Reality Synthesizer

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GeForce 305M  vs  RSX Reality Synthesizer.

1045
Place in performance rating
not rated
GT2xx
Architecture
Curie
10 January 2010 (11 years ago)
Release date
4 October 2012 (9 years ago)
$163
Price now
no data
0.01
Value for money
no data
n11m-lp1
GPU code name
RSX-CXD5302
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GeForce 305M  vs  RSX Reality Synthesizer in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

525 MHz
Core clock speed
550 MHz
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
4.200
Texture fill rate
13.20
36.8 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
16
CUDA cores
no data
55
Gigaflops
no data
16
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
260 million
Number of transistors
302 million
14 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
80 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce 305M and RSX Reality Synthesizer come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
IGP
PCI-E 2.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce 305M vs RSX Reality Synthesizer.

GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
Memory type
GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1400 MHz
11.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
22.4 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA GeForce 305M vs RSX Reality Synthesizer.

DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Display Connectors
No outputs
+
Multi monitor support
no data
2048x1536
Maximum VGA resolution
no data
+
HDMI
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
CUDA
no data
8.0
Power management
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GeForce 305M and RSX Reality Synthesizer is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
2.1
OpenGL
ES 1.1
N/A
Vulkan
no data
4.1
Shader Model
no data
1.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce 305M and RSX Reality Synthesizer graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce 305M or RSX Reality Synthesizer good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 305M
RSX Reality Synthesizer
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 305M
RSX Reality Synthesizer
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 305M
RSX Reality Synthesizer
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 305M
RSX Reality Synthesizer
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 305M
RSX Reality Synthesizer
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 305M

2% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of RSX Reality Synthesizer

More memory bandwidth (22.4 GB/s vs 11.2 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce 305M or RSX Reality Synthesizer?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce 305M .

NVIDIA GeForce 305M versus RSX Reality Synthesizer performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

1.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
1.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score