Mobility FireGL V5250
VS
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Mobility FireGL V5250
VS
NVIDIA Quadro T1000

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Mobility FireGL V5250  vs  NVIDIA Quadro T1000.

not rated
Place in performance rating
211
R500
Architecture
Turing
no data
Code name
TU117
no data
Type
Workstation
1 January 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
no data
Price now
$2063
no data
Value for money
6.40
M56GL
GPU code name
TU117
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Mobility FireGL V5250  vs  NVIDIA Quadro T1000 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

5 MHz
Core clock speed
1395 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
no data
Transistor count
4,700 million
90 nm
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
5.400
Texture fill rate
no data
17
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
400 MHz
Boost clock speed
1455 MHz
157 million
Number of transistors
4,700 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
50 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Mobility FireGL V5250 and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
medium sized
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Mobility FireGL V5250 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000.

DDR/DDR2/GDDR3/GDDR4
Memory type
no data
256 MB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
700 MBps
Memory clock speed
8000 MHz
11.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Mobility FireGL V5250 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Mobility FireGL V5250 and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12.0 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
Vulkan
no data
3.0
Shader Model
no data
N/A
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Mobility FireGL V5250 and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Mobility FireGL V5250 or NVIDIA Quadro T1000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Mobility FireGL V5250
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Death Stranding (2020) Mobility FireGL V5250
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
F1 2020 (2020) Mobility FireGL V5250
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Gears Tactics (2020) Mobility FireGL V5250
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Doom Eternal (2020) Mobility FireGL V5250
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Mobility FireGL V5250

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro T1000

30.78% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 90 nm)

So, Mobility FireGL V5250 or NVIDIA Quadro T1000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro T1000 .

Mobility FireGL V5250 versus NVIDIA Quadro T1000 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
4.1 Out of 59 Hitesti Score