General info
The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Matrox Parhelia APVe vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330.
Technical specs
Which GPU is better between Matrox Parhelia APVe vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Let’s discuss how graphics cards Matrox Parhelia APVe and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.
Memory
Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Matrox Parhelia APVe vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330.
Video outputs and ports
Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Matrox Parhelia APVe vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330.
Technologies
Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.
API support
The confrontation between the two contenders Matrox Parhelia APVe and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
Gaming performance
Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Matrox Parhelia APVe and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Matrox Parhelia APVe or NVIDIA GeForce MX330 good for gaming.
|
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | Matrox Parhelia APVe | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | 27 | 13 | 11 | 9 | |||
| Death Stranding (2020) | Matrox Parhelia APVe | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | 33.4 | 14.7 | 13.7 | 13.4 | |||
| F1 2020 (2020) | Matrox Parhelia APVe | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | 81 | 39 | 28 | 16 | |||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | Matrox Parhelia APVe | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | 94.6 | 34.5 | 22.1 | 15.9 | |||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | Matrox Parhelia APVe | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | 35.3 | ||||||
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps |
| May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected. | |
| 30 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps |
| 40 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps |
| 60 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps |
| May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected. | |
| ? | Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene. |
| Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family. | |
| The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results. | |
Advantages of Matrox Parhelia APVe
Cheaper ($228 vs $1079)
More maximum RAM amount (128 MB vs 2 GB)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX330
7.64% faster in synthetic tests
Finer manufacturing process technology (16 nm vs 150 nm)
More memory bandwidth (48.06 GB/s vs 8 GB/s)
Multi Monitor
So, Matrox Parhelia APVe or NVIDIA GeForce MX330?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce MX330 .
Matrox Parhelia APVe versus NVIDIA GeForce MX330 performance benchmarks comparison
Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
User rating
