Lexington
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Lexington
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 600

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Lexington  vs  Intel UHD Graphics 600.

not rated
Place in performance rating
944
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Gen. 9 Gemini Lake
no data
Code name
Gemini Lake GT1
no data
Type
Laptop
no data
Release date
11 December 2017 (3 years ago)
$43
Price now
$274
no data
Value for money
0.87
Lexington
GPU code name
Gemini Lake
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Lexington  vs  Intel UHD Graphics 600 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
96
no data
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
750 MHz
no data
Transistor count
189 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
5 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
9.000
400
Pipelines / CUDA cores
12
no data
Boost clock speed
700 MHz
2,154 million
Number of transistors
189 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
5 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Lexington and Intel UHD Graphics 600 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Lexington vs Intel UHD Graphics 600.

no data
Memory type
DDR4 / LPDDR4
no data
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Lexington vs Intel UHD Graphics 600.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Lexington and Intel UHD Graphics 600 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
Vulkan
+
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
1.2
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Lexington and Intel UHD Graphics 600 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Lexington or Intel UHD Graphics 600 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Lexington
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Death Stranding (2020) Lexington
Intel UHD Graphics 600
F1 2020 (2020) Lexington
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Gears Tactics (2020) Lexington
Intel UHD Graphics 600 5.1
Doom Eternal (2020) Lexington
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Lexington

Cheaper ($43 vs $274)

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 600

2.01% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)

So, Lexington or Intel UHD Graphics 600?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel UHD Graphics 600 .

Lexington versus Intel UHD Graphics 600 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
3.6 Out of 1182 Hitesti Score