General info
The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs Matrox QID LP PCI.
Technical specs
Which GPU is better between Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs Matrox QID LP PCI in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Let’s discuss how graphics cards Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) and Matrox QID LP PCI come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.
Memory
Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs Matrox QID LP PCI.
Video outputs and ports
Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs Matrox QID LP PCI.
Technologies
Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.
API support
The confrontation between the two contenders Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) and Matrox QID LP PCI is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
Gaming performance
Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) and Matrox QID LP PCI graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) or Matrox QID LP PCI good for gaming.
|
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | ||||||
| Matrox QID LP PCI | |||||||
| Death Stranding (2020) | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | ||||||
| Matrox QID LP PCI | |||||||
| F1 2020 (2020) | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | ||||||
| Matrox QID LP PCI | |||||||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | ||||||
| Matrox QID LP PCI | |||||||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | ||||||
| Matrox QID LP PCI | |||||||
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps |
| May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected. | |
| 30 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps |
| 40 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps |
| 60 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps |
| May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected. | |
| ? | Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene. |
| Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family. | |
| The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results. | |
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
4.18% faster in synthetic tests
Advantages of Matrox QID LP PCI
So, Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) or Matrox QID LP PCI?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) .
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) versus Matrox QID LP PCI performance benchmarks comparison
Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
User rating
