Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
VS
GRID M60-4A
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
VS
GRID M60-4A

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)  vs  GRID M60-4A.

701
Place in performance rating
not rated
Gen. 11
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
11 January 2021 (less than a year ago)
Release date
30 August 2015 (6 years ago)
Gen. 11
GPU code name
GM204
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)  vs  GRID M60-4A in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

350 MHz
Core clock speed
557 MHz
10 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Texture fill rate
150.8
no data
Floating-point performance
4,833 gflops
24
Pipelines / CUDA cores
2048
800 MHz
Boost clock speed
1178 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
5,200 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
225 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) and GRID M60-4A come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs GRID M60-4A.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
160.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs GRID M60-4A.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
5.2
+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) and GRID M60-4A is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
12 (12_1)
no data
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.1.126
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) and GRID M60-4A graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) or GRID M60-4A good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
GRID M60-4A
Death Stranding (2020) Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
GRID M60-4A
F1 2020 (2020) Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
GRID M60-4A
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
GRID M60-4A
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
GRID M60-4A
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

4.18% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (10 nm vs 28 nm)

Advantages of GRID M60-4A

There is no accountable advantage

So, Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) or GRID M60-4A?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) .

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) versus GRID M60-4A performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.3 Out of 7 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score