Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4.

377
Place in performance rating
2870
no data
Value for money (0-100)
0.27
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Architecture
Pascal
Tiger Lake Xe
Code name
GP108
Laptop
Type
Desktop
15 August 2020 (1 year ago)
Release date
12 March 2018
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$79
no data
Price now
$100
Tiger Lake Xe
GPU code name
no data
Laptop
Market segment
no data

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

96
Pipelines
384
no data
Core clock speed
1152 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1379 MHz
no data
Transistor count
1,800 million
10 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
20 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
33.10
no data
Floating-point performance
1,059 gflops
96
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
no data
Length
145 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4.

DDR4
Memory type
DDR4
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
2100 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
16.8 GB/s
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX 12_1
DirectX
12 (12_1)
no data
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

24.12% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (10 nm vs 14 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

More pipelines (384 vs 96)

So, Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 .

Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 performance benchmarks comparison

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
2.9 Out of 35 Hitesti Score