Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
VS
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
VS
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs  vs  Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900.

325
Place in performance rating
not rated
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Architecture
Gen. 3
15 August 2020 (1 year ago)
Release date
1 March 2005 (16 years ago)
Tiger Lake Xe
GPU code name
GMA 900
Laptop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs  vs  Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

400 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
10 nm
Manufacturing process technology
130 nm
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
4
1250 MHz
Boost clock speed
400 MHz

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
DirectX 9c, Shader 2.0

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

14.62% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (10 nm vs 130 nm)

Advantages of Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900

There is no accountable advantage

So, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs .

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs versus Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 performance benchmarks comparison

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 3.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.3 Out of 87 Hitesti Score
2.8 Out of 13 Hitesti Score