Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
VS
AMD Radeon 540X
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
VS
AMD Radeon 540X

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200  vs  AMD Radeon 540X.

551
Place in performance rating
558
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Broadwell GT3e
Code name
Lexa
Laptop
Type
Laptop
2 June 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
12 August 2019 (2 years ago)
$645
Price now
$421
0.82
Value for money
3.25
Broadwell GT3e
GPU code name
Lexa
Laptop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200  vs  AMD Radeon 540X in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

384
Pipelines
512
300 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
850 MHz
Boost Clock
1046 MHz
189 million
Transistor count
2,200 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
40.80
Texture fill rate
33.47
883.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
48
Pipelines / CUDA cores
512
1150 MHz
Boost clock speed
1219 MHz
189 million
Number of transistors
2,200 million
15 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
50 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and AMD Radeon 540X come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x1
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
medium sized
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs AMD Radeon 540X.

System Shared
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
+
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs AMD Radeon 540X.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and AMD Radeon 540X is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.1.80
Vulkan
+
5.1
Shader Model
no data
2.0
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and AMD Radeon 540X graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or AMD Radeon 540X good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
AMD Radeon 540X
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
AMD Radeon 540X
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
AMD Radeon 540X
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
AMD Radeon 540X
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
AMD Radeon 540X 41.1
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

0.67% faster in synthetic tests

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 50 Watt)

Advantages of AMD Radeon 540X

Cheaper ($421 vs $645)

More pipelines (512 vs 384)

So, Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or AMD Radeon 540X?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 .

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 versus AMD Radeon 540X performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

15167 (98 %)

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

2435 (100 %)

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

2779 (100 %)

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

4097 (100 %)

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

11545 (100 %)

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 3.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

1355 (100 %)

User rating

3.2 Out of 11 Hitesti Score
4.3 Out of 157 Hitesti Score