General info
The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 vs Intel UHD Graphics 610.
Technical specs
Which GPU is better between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 vs Intel UHD Graphics 610 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Let’s discuss how graphics cards Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Intel UHD Graphics 610 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.
Memory
Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 vs Intel UHD Graphics 610.
Video outputs and ports
Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 vs Intel UHD Graphics 610.
Technologies
Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.
API support
The confrontation between the two contenders Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Intel UHD Graphics 610 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
Gaming performance
Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Intel UHD Graphics 610 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 or Intel UHD Graphics 610 good for gaming.
|
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 | ||||||
| Intel UHD Graphics 610 | |||||||
| Death Stranding (2020) | Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 | ||||||
| Intel UHD Graphics 610 | |||||||
| F1 2020 (2020) | Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 | ||||||
| Intel UHD Graphics 610 | |||||||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 | ||||||
| Intel UHD Graphics 610 | 15.5 | ||||||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 | ||||||
| Intel UHD Graphics 610 | |||||||
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps |
| May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected. | |
| 30 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps |
| 40 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps |
| 60 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps |
| May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected. | |
| ? | Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene. |
| Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family. | |
| The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results. | |
Advantages of Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
Cheaper ($77 vs $601)
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 610
3.33% faster in synthetic tests
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 90 nm)
So, Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 or Intel UHD Graphics 610?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel UHD Graphics 610 .
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 versus Intel UHD Graphics 610 performance benchmarks comparison
Overall benchmark performance
Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark Unigine Heaven 3.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
User rating
