GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
VS
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
VS
AMD Radeon Pro 5300

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh  vs  AMD Radeon Pro 5300.

not rated
Place in performance rating
187
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
15 May 2019 (2 years ago)
Release date
4 August 2020 (1 year ago)
no data
Price now
$2699
no data
Value for money
5.58
TU116B
GPU code name
Navi 14
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh  vs  AMD Radeon Pro 5300 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
7 nm
152.6
Texture fill rate
132.0
1536
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1280
1590 MHz
Boost clock speed
1650 MHz
6,600 million
Number of transistors
6,400 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
85 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh and AMD Radeon Pro 5300 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300.

GDDR6
Memory type
GDDR6
6 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
192 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
16 GB/s
Memory clock speed
14 GB/s
384.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
224.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300.

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs
+
HDMI
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

7.5
CUDA
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh and AMD Radeon Pro 5300 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (12_1)
DirectX
no data
4.6
OpenGL
no data
1.2
Vulkan
no data
6.5
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh and AMD Radeon Pro 5300 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh or AMD Radeon Pro 5300 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Death Stranding (2020) GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
F1 2020 (2020) GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Gears Tactics (2020) GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Doom Eternal (2020) GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

More maximum RAM amount (6 GB vs 4 GB)

More memory bandwidth (384.0 GB/s vs 224.0 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5300

29.2% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 12 nm)

So, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh or AMD Radeon Pro 5300?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon Pro 5300 .

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh versus AMD Radeon Pro 5300 performance benchmarks comparison

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.4 Out of 16 Hitesti Score
3.5 Out of 26 Hitesti Score