GeForce 7800 GTX 512
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce 7800 GTX 512
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between GeForce 7800 GTX 512  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.

not rated
Place in performance rating
217
Curie
Architecture
Turing
no data
Code name
TU117
no data
Type
Laptop
14 November 2005 (16 years ago)
Release date
2 April 2020 (1 year ago)
$649
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$250 (0.4x MSRP)
Price now
$1183
no data
Value for money
6.32
G70
GPU code name
N18P-G62 Max-Q
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between GeForce 7800 GTX 512  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
1024
550 MHz
Core clock speed
1035 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
no data
Transistor count
4,700 million
110 nm
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
13.20
Texture fill rate
76.80
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1024
no data
Boost clock speed
1200 MHz
302 million
Number of transistors
4,700 million
108 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
50 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards GeForce 7800 GTX 512 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
228 mm
Length
no data
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between GeForce 7800 GTX 512 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.

GDDR3
Memory type
GDDR6
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1700 MHz
Memory clock speed
10000 MHz
54.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between GeForce 7800 GTX 512 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
No outputs

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders GeForce 7800 GTX 512 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
Vulkan
no data
3.0
Shader Model
no data
N/A
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for GeForce 7800 GTX 512 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the GeForce 7800 GTX 512 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) GeForce 7800 GTX 512
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Death Stranding (2020) GeForce 7800 GTX 512
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
F1 2020 (2020) GeForce 7800 GTX 512
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Gears Tactics (2020) GeForce 7800 GTX 512
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 162.9 73.7 44.4 33.4 23.5 13.5
Doom Eternal (2020) GeForce 7800 GTX 512
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 145.1 91.2 52.6
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of GeForce 7800 GTX 512

Cheaper ($250 (0.4x MSRP) vs $1183)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 4 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

30.26% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 110 nm)

More memory bandwidth (160.0 GB/s vs 54.4 GB/s)

So, GeForce 7800 GTX 512 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q .

GeForce 7800 GTX 512 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q performance benchmarks comparison

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
4.4 Out of 9 Hitesti Score