AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition.

2844
Place in performance rating
not rated
0.03
Value for money (0-100)
no data
GCN 1.4
Architecture
Kepler
Vega 10
Code name
GK107
Desktop
Type
Desktop
27 June 2017
Release date
3 February 2013 (8 years ago)
$1,499
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$1030
Price now
$50
no data
GPU code name
GK107
no data
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

4096
Pipelines
384
1500 MHz
Core clock speed
745 MHz
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
no data
Transistor count
1,270 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
375 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
32 Watt
409.6
Texture fill rate
23.84
13,107 gflops
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
no data
Number of transistors
1,270 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
32 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
267 mm
Length
no data
2x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition.

HBM2
Memory type
GDDR5
16 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
2048 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
1886 MHz
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
482.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
40 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition.

1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
12 (11_0)
no data
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid or NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid

1.11% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (4096 vs 384)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

More memory bandwidth (482.8 GB/s vs 40 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

Cheaper ($50 vs $1030)

Less power consumption (32 Watt vs 375 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 16 GB)

So, AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid or NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid .

AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
2.5 Out of 2 Hitesti Score