AMD Radeon R9 M385
VS
Radeon DDR VIVO SE
AMD Radeon R9 M385
VS
Radeon DDR VIVO SE

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon R9 M385  vs  Radeon DDR VIVO SE.

491
Place in performance rating
not rated
GCN
Architecture
Rage 6
16 June 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
14 August 2001 (20 years ago)
$999
Price now
no data
0.75
Value for money
no data
Strato
GPU code name
Rage 6
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon R9 M385  vs  Radeon DDR VIVO SE in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Core clock speed
187 MHz
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
180 nm
56.00
Texture fill rate
1.122
1,792 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
896
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
1100 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
2,080 million
Number of transistors
30 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon R9 M385 and Radeon DDR VIVO SE come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
AGP 4x
medium sized
Laptop size
no data
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon DDR VIVO SE.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
64 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1500 MHz
Memory clock speed
360 MHz
76.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
5.76 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon DDR VIVO SE.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x VGA, 2x S-Video
1
Eyefinity
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

-
AppAcceleration
no data
1
FreeSync
no data
+
HD3D
no data
+
PowerTune
no data
+
TrueAudio
no data
+
ZeroCore
no data
-
Enduro
no data
1
DualGraphics
no data
1
Switchable graphics
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon R9 M385 and Radeon DDR VIVO SE is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX® 12
DirectX
7.0
4.4
OpenGL
1.3
no data
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
no data
Not Listed
OpenCL
N/A
+
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R9 M385 and Radeon DDR VIVO SE graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R9 M385 or Radeon DDR VIVO SE good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R9 M385
Radeon DDR VIVO SE
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R9 M385
Radeon DDR VIVO SE
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R9 M385
Radeon DDR VIVO SE
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R9 M385
Radeon DDR VIVO SE
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R9 M385
Radeon DDR VIVO SE
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M385

7.85% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 180 nm)

More memory bandwidth (76.8 GB/s vs 5.76 GB/s)

Advantages of Radeon DDR VIVO SE

More maximum RAM amount (64 MB vs 4 GB)

So, AMD Radeon R9 M385 or Radeon DDR VIVO SE?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R9 M385 .

AMD Radeon R9 M385 versus Radeon DDR VIVO SE performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score