AMD Radeon Pro W6600
VS
Radeon X1650 XT AGP
AMD Radeon Pro W6600
VS
Radeon X1650 XT AGP

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon Pro W6600  vs  Radeon X1650 XT AGP.

76
Place in performance rating
not rated
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
R500
8 June 2021 (less than a year ago)
Release date
30 October 2006 (15 years ago)
$649
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$951 (1.5x MSRP)
Price now
no data
34.64
Value for money
no data
Navi 23
GPU code name
RV560
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon Pro W6600  vs  Radeon X1650 XT AGP in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Core clock speed
540 MHz
7 nm
Manufacturing process technology
80 nm
325.1
Texture fill rate
4.320
1792
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
2903 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
11,060 million
Number of transistors
330 million
100 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
55 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and Radeon X1650 XT AGP come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 4.0 x16
Interface
AGP 8x
241 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs Radeon X1650 XT AGP.

GDDR6
Memory type
GDDR3
8 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
14 GB/s
Memory clock speed
1360 MHz
224.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
21.76 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs Radeon X1650 XT AGP.

4x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and Radeon X1650 XT AGP is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
no data
OpenGL
2.0
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
3.0
no data
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and Radeon X1650 XT AGP graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon Pro W6600 or Radeon X1650 XT AGP good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Radeon X1650 XT AGP
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Radeon X1650 XT AGP
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Radeon X1650 XT AGP
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Radeon X1650 XT AGP
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Radeon X1650 XT AGP
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6600

52.99% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 80 nm)

More memory bandwidth (224.0 GB/s vs 21.76 GB/s)

Advantages of Radeon X1650 XT AGP

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 8 GB)

So, AMD Radeon Pro W6600 or Radeon X1650 XT AGP?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon Pro W6600 .

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 versus Radeon X1650 XT AGP performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.2 Out of 11 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score