AMD Radeon Pro VII
VS
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD
AMD Radeon Pro VII
VS
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon Pro VII  vs  Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD.

37
Place in performance rating
not rated
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Gen. 4.5
13 May 2020 (1 year ago)
Release date
1 October 2008 (13 years ago)
$1,899
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$4876 (2.6x MSRP)
Price now
no data
5.31
Value for money
no data
Vega 20
GPU code name
Montevina
Workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon Pro VII  vs  Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Core clock speed
640 MHz
7 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
408.0
Texture fill rate
no data
3840
Pipelines / CUDA cores
10
1700 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
13,230 million
Number of transistors
no data
250 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon Pro VII and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 4.0 x16
Interface
no data
305 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon Pro VII vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD.

HBM2
Memory type
no data
16 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
4096 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
2000 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
1024 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon Pro VII vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD.

6x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon Pro VII and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon Pro VII and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon Pro VII or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon Pro VII
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon Pro VII
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon Pro VII
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon Pro VII
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon Pro VII
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro VII

64.21% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 65 nm)

Advantages of Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD

There is no accountable advantage

So, AMD Radeon Pro VII or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon Pro VII .

AMD Radeon Pro VII versus Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD performance benchmarks comparison

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.0 Out of 1023 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score