AMD FirePro W7000
VS
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
AMD FirePro W7000
VS
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD FirePro W7000  vs  GeForce RTX 2060 TU104.

287
Place in performance rating
not rated
18.08
Value for money (0-100)
no data
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
Pitcairn
Code name
no data
Workstation
Type
no data
13 June 2012 (9 years ago)
Release date
10 January 2020 (1 year ago)
$899
Launch price (MSRP)
$349
$298 (0.3x MSRP)
Price now
$320 (0.9x MSRP)
7.09
Value for money
no data
Pitcairn
GPU code name
TU104
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD FirePro W7000  vs  GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1280
Pipelines
no data
950 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
2,800 million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
350 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
76.00
Texture fill rate
201.6
2,432 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
1280
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1920
no data
Boost clock speed
1680 MHz
2,800 million
Number of transistors
13,600 million
350 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
160 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD FirePro W7000 and GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
242 mm
Length
229 mm
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data
full height / full length
Form factor
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD FirePro W7000 vs GeForce RTX 2060 TU104.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR6
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
192 Bit
4800 MHz
Memory clock speed
14000 MHz
153.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
336.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD FirePro W7000 vs GeForce RTX 2060 TU104.

4x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
no data
HDMI
+
1
StereoOutput3D
no data
1
Dual-link DVI support
no data
4
DisplayPort count
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
7.5

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD FirePro W7000 and GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.5
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD FirePro W7000 and GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD FirePro W7000 or GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD FirePro W7000
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
Death Stranding (2020) AMD FirePro W7000
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
F1 2020 (2020) AMD FirePro W7000
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD FirePro W7000
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD FirePro W7000
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD FirePro W7000

19.52% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($298 (0.3x MSRP) vs $320 (0.9x MSRP))

Advantages of GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (6 GB vs 4 GB)

More memory bandwidth (336.0 GB/s vs 153.6 GB/s)

So, AMD FirePro W7000 or GeForce RTX 2060 TU104?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro W7000 .

AMD FirePro W7000 versus GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.0 Out of 5 Hitesti Score
4.2 Out of 16 Hitesti Score