AMD FirePro W6150M
VS
Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition
AMD FirePro W6150M
VS
Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD FirePro W6150M  vs  Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition.

537
Place in performance rating
not rated
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Rage 7
12 November 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
14 March 2004 (17 years ago)
$299
Price now
$447
3.30
Value for money
no data
Saturn
GPU code name
RV250
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD FirePro W6150M  vs  Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1075 MHz
Core clock speed
275 MHz
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
150 nm
51.60
Texture fill rate
1.100
1,651 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
768
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
2,080 million
Number of transistors
36 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
28 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD FirePro W6150M and Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

MXM-B (3.0)
Interface
AGP 4x
None
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD FirePro W6150M vs Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
64 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
5500 MHz
Memory clock speed
550 MHz
88 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
8.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD FirePro W6150M vs Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition.

No outputs
Display Connectors
2x DVI

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD FirePro W6150M and Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
8.1
no data
OpenGL
1.4
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD FirePro W6150M and Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD FirePro W6150M or Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD FirePro W6150M
Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition
Death Stranding (2020) AMD FirePro W6150M
Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition
F1 2020 (2020) AMD FirePro W6150M
Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD FirePro W6150M
Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD FirePro W6150M
Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD FirePro W6150M

6.68% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($299 vs $447)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 150 nm)

More memory bandwidth (88 GB/s vs 8.8 GB/s)

Advantages of Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition

More maximum RAM amount (64 MB vs 4 GB)

So, AMD FirePro W6150M or Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro W6150M .

AMD FirePro W6150M versus Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
3.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score