AMD Cedar
VS
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
AMD Cedar
VS
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Cedar  vs  NVIDIA Titan X Pascal.

not rated
Place in performance rating
86
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Pascal
Cedar
Code name
GP102
Desktop
Type
Desktop
no data
Release date
25 July 2016 (5 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,199
$17.81
Price now
$900 (0.8x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
21.59
Cedar
GPU code name
GP102
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Cedar  vs  NVIDIA Titan X Pascal in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

80
Pipelines
3584
no data
Core clock speed
1418 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
11,800 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
250 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
342.9
no data
Floating-point performance
10,974 gflops
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
3584
no data
Boost clock speed
1531 MHz
292 million
Number of transistors
11,800 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
250 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Cedar vs NVIDIA Titan X Pascal.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5X
no data
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
no data
Memory bus width
384 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
10000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
480.4 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Cedar vs NVIDIA Titan X Pascal.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
no data
G-SYNC support
+
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
GPU Boost
+
no data
CUDA
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cedar or NVIDIA Titan X Pascal good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal 128 107 93 75 60 34
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal 167 129 121 117 88.4 49.2
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal 361.8 231.9 142 106.7 67.9 39
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal 225 212 182 181 110 57.6
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cedar

Cheaper ($17.81 vs $900 (0.8x MSRP))

Advantages of NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

61.44% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (3584 vs 80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (16 nm vs 40 nm)

G-SYNC support

So, AMD Cedar or NVIDIA Titan X Pascal?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Titan X Pascal .

AMD Cedar versus NVIDIA Titan X Pascal performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Unigine Heaven 4.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 4.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 4.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Medical: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Medical test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Maya: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Maya test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Energy: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Energy test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Creo: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Creo test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Catia: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Catia test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score
4.0 Out of 23 Hitesti Score