AMD Cedar
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
AMD Cedar
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Cedar  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560.

not rated
Place in performance rating
400
no data
Value for money (0-100)
10.69
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Cedar
Code name
GF114
Desktop
Type
Desktop
no data
Release date
17 May 2011 (10 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$199
$17.81
Price now
$109 (0.5x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
5.95
Cedar
GPU code name
GF114
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Cedar  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

80
Pipelines
336
no data
Core clock speed
810 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
1,950 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
45.36
no data
Floating-point performance
1,088.6 gflops
no data
Maximum GPU temperature
99 °C
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
336
292 million
Number of transistors
1,950 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
150 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Cedar and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
8.25" (21 cm)
no data
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
no data
SLI options
+
no data
Bus support
16x PCI-E 2.0
no data
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Cedar vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
128.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Cedar vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560.

no data
Display Connectors
Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI
no data
Multi monitor support
+
no data
HDCP
+
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
no data
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
3D Vision
+
no data
CUDA
+
no data
3D Gaming
+
no data
3D Blu-Ray
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Cedar and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.1
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cedar and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cedar or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cedar

Cheaper ($17.81 vs $109 (0.5x MSRP))

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

13.73% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (336 vs 80)

So, AMD Cedar or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 .

AMD Cedar versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Unigine Heaven 4.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 4.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 4.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score
3.8 Out of 75 Hitesti Score