AMD Cayman
VS
AMD Radeon R5 M255
AMD Cayman
VS
AMD Radeon R5 M255

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Cayman  vs  AMD Radeon R5 M255.

not rated
Place in performance rating
854
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN
Cayman
Code name
Topaz
Desktop
Type
Laptop
no data
Release date
1 May 2014 (7 years ago)
$17.44
Price now
no data
Cayman
GPU code name
Topaz Pro / Sun
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Cayman  vs  AMD Radeon R5 M255 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1536
Pipelines
384
no data
Core clock speed
940 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
940 MHz
2,640 million
Transistor count
1,550 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Texture fill rate
22.56
no data
Floating-point performance
721.9 gflops
no data
Compute units
5
1536
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
no data
Boost clock speed
940 MHz
2,640 million
Number of transistors
1,550 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R5 M255 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0 x8

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Cayman vs AMD Radeon R5 M255.

no data
Memory type
DDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
16 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Cayman vs AMD Radeon R5 M255.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
Eyefinity
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
AppAcceleration
+
no data
HD3D
+
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
+
no data
Enduro
-
no data
DualGraphics
1
no data
Switchable graphics
1
no data
PowerPlay
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R5 M255 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX® 11
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
no data
Shader Model
6.3
no data
OpenCL
Not Listed
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R5 M255 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cayman or AMD Radeon R5 M255 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R5 M255
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R5 M255
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R5 M255
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R5 M255
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R5 M255 8.5
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cayman

More pipelines (1536 vs 384)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 M255

2.71% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cayman or AMD Radeon R5 M255?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R5 M255 .

AMD Cayman versus AMD Radeon R5 M255 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Medical: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Medical test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Maya: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Maya test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Energy: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Energy test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Creo: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Creo test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Catia: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Catia test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 4 Hitesti Score