AMD Caicos
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
AMD Caicos
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Caicos  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX.

not rated
Place in performance rating
288
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
Caicos
Code name
no data
Desktop
Type
Laptop
no data
Release date
23 October 2012 (9 years ago)
$10.38
Price now
$200
no data
Value for money
7.34
Caicos
GPU code name
no data
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Caicos  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

160
Pipelines
1536
no data
Core clock speed
720 MHz
370 million
Transistor count
3540 Million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
122 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
92.2 billion/sec
no data
CUDA cores
1536
160
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1536
370 million
Number of transistors
3540 Million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
122 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Caicos and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Laptop size
large
no data
SLI options
+
no data
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Caicos vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
2500 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
3D Vision
+
no data
CUDA
+
no data
Optimus
+
no data
FXAA
+
no data
TXAA
+
no data
Adaptive VSync
+
no data
Verde Drivers
+
no data
DirectX 11
DirectX 11
no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Caicos and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 API
4.4
OpenGL
4.5
no data
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Caicos and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Caicos or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Caicos

Cheaper ($10.38 vs $200)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX

20.77% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1536 vs 160)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Caicos or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX .

AMD Caicos versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score