AMD Caicos
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
AMD Caicos
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Caicos  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250.

not rated
Place in performance rating
800
no data
Value for money (0-100)
7.68
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
Caicos
Code name
G92B
Desktop
Type
Desktop
no data
Release date
4 March 2009 (12 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$199
$10.38
Price now
$117 (0.6x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.23
Caicos
GPU code name
G92B
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Caicos  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

160
Pipelines
128
no data
Core clock speed
738 MHz
370 million
Transistor count
754 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
47.2 billion/sec
no data
Floating-point performance
387.1 gflops
no data
Maximum GPU temperature
105 °C
no data
CUDA cores
128
160
Pipelines / CUDA cores
128
370 million
Number of transistors
754 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
150 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Caicos and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm)
no data
Supplementary power connectors
6-pin
no data
SLI options
+
no data
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Caicos vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250.

no data
Memory type
GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1100 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
70.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Caicos vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250.

no data
Display Connectors
Two Dual Link DVI
no data
Multi monitor support
+
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
no data
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
3D Vision
+
no data
CUDA
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Caicos and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.0

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Caicos and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Caicos or NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Caicos

Cheaper ($10.38 vs $117 (0.6x MSRP))

More pipelines (160 vs 128)

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 55 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

3.8% faster in synthetic tests

So, AMD Caicos or NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 .

AMD Caicos versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
3.5 Out of 112 Hitesti Score