AMD Caicos
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
AMD Caicos
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Caicos  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 520.

not rated
Place in performance rating
964
no data
Value for money (0-100)
4.34
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Caicos
Code name
GF119
Desktop
Type
Desktop
no data
Release date
13 April 2011 (10 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$59
$10.38
Price now
$62 (1.1x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.11
Caicos
GPU code name
GF119
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Caicos  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

160
Pipelines
48
no data
Core clock speed
810 MHz
370 million
Transistor count
292 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
29 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
6.5 billion/sec
no data
Floating-point performance
155.52 gflops
no data
Maximum GPU temperature
102 °C
no data
CUDA cores
48
160
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
370 million
Number of transistors
292 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
29 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Caicos and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Bus support
16x PCI-E 2.0
no data
Height
2.7" (6.9 cm)

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Caicos vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520.

no data
Memory type
DDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB (DDR3)
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
900 MHz (DDR3)
no data
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Caicos vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520.

no data
Display Connectors
Dual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional)
no data
Multi monitor support
+
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
no data
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Caicos and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Caicos and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Caicos or NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Caicos

Cheaper ($10.38 vs $62 (1.1x MSRP))

More pipelines (160 vs 48)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

2.32% faster in synthetic tests

So, AMD Caicos or NVIDIA GeForce GT 520?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 .

AMD Caicos versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
4.1 Out of 54 Hitesti Score