AMD Caicos
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
VS

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Caicos  vs  NVIDIA GeForce 825M.

1051
Place in performance rating
669
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
Caicos
Code name
GK208
Desktop
Type
Laptop
no data
Release date
27 January 2014

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Caicos  vs  NVIDIA GeForce 825M in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

160
Pipelines
384
no data
Core clock speed
850 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
941 MHz
370 million
Transistor count
915 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
30.11
no data
Floating-point performance
722.7 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how video cards AMD Caicos and NVIDIA GeForce 825M come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Caicos vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M.

no data
Memory type
DDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two video cards. What's the difference between AMD Caicos vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA и AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
+
no data
Optimus
+

API support

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Caicos and NVIDIA GeForce 825M video cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Caicos or NVIDIA GeForce 825M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Caicos

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 825M

4.56% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 160)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Caicos or NVIDIA GeForce 825M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce 825M .

AMD Caicos versus NVIDIA GeForce 825M performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Unlike Ice Storm, Cloud Gate test elaborated by 3DMark employs more resource-intensive scenes. The better the final estimation, the faster your videocard is. The processing is carried out by means of DirectX 10.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

This is an advanced videocard benchmark. With DirectX 11 being used for conducting the processing, the normal testing time is 15 minutes. The higher the estimation, the faster the videocard is.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Complex graphic scenes require all the videocard’s resources. They use the entire RAM and computing power. The test’s results can be viewed below.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

This benchmark analyzes the videocard’s game power with the use of Direct X 11 (multi-threading, tessellation, shader computations).

3DMark Vantage Performance

This Direct X10-based benchmark contains AI tests, physics, and 6 computing tests.

Passmark

PassMark is a great benchmark that gets updated regularly and shows relevant information on the videocard’s performance.

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score