AMD Caicos
VS
AMD FirePro W5170M
AMD Caicos
VS
AMD FirePro W5170M

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Caicos  vs  AMD FirePro W5170M.

not rated
Place in performance rating
450
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN
Caicos
Code name
Tropo
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
2 October 2015 (6 years ago)
$10.38
Price now
$1530
no data
Value for money
1.01
Caicos
GPU code name
Tropo
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Caicos  vs  AMD FirePro W5170M in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

160
Pipelines
640
no data
Boost Clock
925 MHz
370 million
Transistor count
1,500 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Texture fill rate
37.00
no data
Floating-point performance
1,184 gflops
160
Pipelines / CUDA cores
640
no data
Boost clock speed
925 MHz
370 million
Number of transistors
1,500 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Caicos and AMD FirePro W5170M come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Caicos vs AMD FirePro W5170M.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Caicos vs AMD FirePro W5170M.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
Eyefinity
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
AppAcceleration
+
no data
Enduro
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Caicos and AMD FirePro W5170M is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Caicos and AMD FirePro W5170M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Caicos or AMD FirePro W5170M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Caicos
AMD FirePro W5170M
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Caicos
AMD FirePro W5170M
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Caicos
AMD FirePro W5170M
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Caicos
AMD FirePro W5170M
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Caicos
AMD FirePro W5170M
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Caicos

Cheaper ($10.38 vs $1530)

Advantages of AMD FirePro W5170M

11.15% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (640 vs 160)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Caicos or AMD FirePro W5170M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro W5170M .

AMD Caicos versus AMD FirePro W5170M performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score