AMD Bonaire
VS
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
AMD Bonaire
VS
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Bonaire  vs  NVIDIA Quadro M2000M.

not rated
Place in performance rating
328
no data
Value for money (0-100)
14.62
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
Bonaire
Code name
GM107
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
2 October 2015 (6 years ago)
$15.74
Price now
$363
no data
Value for money
8.52
Bonaire
GPU code name
GM107
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Bonaire  vs  NVIDIA Quadro M2000M in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

896
Pipelines
640
no data
Core clock speed
1038 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
2,080 million
Transistor count
1,870 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
43.92
no data
Floating-point performance
1,405 gflops
896
Pipelines / CUDA cores
640
no data
Boost clock speed
1197 MHz
2,080 million
Number of transistors
1,870 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
55 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Bonaire and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Bonaire vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Bonaire vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
Display Port
1.2

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
5.0
no data
Optimus
+
no data
3D Vision Pro
+
no data
Mosaic
+
no data
nView Display Management
+
no data
nView
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Bonaire and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12
4.6
OpenGL
4.5
no data
Vulkan
+
no data
Shader Model
5.0
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Bonaire and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Bonaire or NVIDIA Quadro M2000M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Bonaire
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Bonaire
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Bonaire
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Bonaire
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Bonaire
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Bonaire

Cheaper ($15.74 vs $363)

More pipelines (896 vs 640)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

16.42% faster in synthetic tests

So, AMD Bonaire or NVIDIA Quadro M2000M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro M2000M .

AMD Bonaire versus NVIDIA Quadro M2000M performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 3.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Medical: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Medical test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Maya: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Maya test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Energy: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Energy test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Creo: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Creo test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Catia: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Catia test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
4.0 Out of 26 Hitesti Score