AMD Baffin
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K500M
AMD Baffin
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K500M

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Baffin  vs  NVIDIA Quadro K500M.

not rated
Place in performance rating
861
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Kepler
Baffin
Code name
GK107
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
1 June 2012 (9 years ago)
$78
Price now
$19.95
4.0
GCN generation
no data
no data
Value for money
0.61
Baffin
GPU code name
N14M-Q1
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Baffin  vs  NVIDIA Quadro K500M in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1024
Pipelines
192
855 MHz
Core clock speed
850 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
3,000 million
Transistor count
1,270 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
80 W
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
Texture fill rate
13.60
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
1024
Pipelines / CUDA cores
192
3,000 million
Number of transistors
1,270 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
35 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Baffin and NVIDIA Quadro K500M come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Baffin vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M.

Memory type
DDR3 / GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
12.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Baffin vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M.

Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

CUDA
+
Optimus
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Baffin and NVIDIA Quadro K500M is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
Vulkan
+
Shader Model
5.1
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Baffin and NVIDIA Quadro K500M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Baffin or NVIDIA Quadro K500M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Baffin
NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Baffin
NVIDIA Quadro K500M
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Baffin
NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Baffin
NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Baffin
NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Baffin

More pipelines (1024 vs 192)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

G-SYNC support

VR Ready

Multi Monitor

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K500M

2.06% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($19.95 vs $78)

Less power consumption (35 Watt vs 80 W)

So, AMD Baffin or NVIDIA Quadro K500M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K500M .

AMD Baffin versus NVIDIA Quadro K500M performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 3 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score