NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
VS
FirePro S9300 X2
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
VS
FirePro S9300 X2

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition  vs  FirePro S9300 X2.

1881
Place in performance rating
not rated
0.13
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GF100
Code name
no data
Workstation
Type
no data
12 June 2011
Release date
31 March 2016 (5 years ago)
$1,199
Launch price (MSRP)
$5,999
$209
Price now
no data
no data
GPU code name
Capsaicin
no data
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition  vs  FirePro S9300 X2 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

256
Pipelines
no data
475 MHz
Core clock speed
850 MHz
3,100 million
Transistor count
no data
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
142 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
15.20
Texture fill rate
217.6
486.4 gflops
Floating-point performance
2x 6,963 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
4096
no data
Number of transistors
8,900 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
300 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and FirePro S9300 X2 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
241 mm
Length
267 mm
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
2x 8-pin

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs FirePro S9300 X2.

GDDR5
Memory type
HBM
1792 MB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
4096 Bit
2808 MHz
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
89.86 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
512.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs FirePro S9300 X2.

1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
No outputs

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and FirePro S9300 X2 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.0
no data
OpenCL
2.0

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and FirePro S9300 X2 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition or FirePro S9300 X2 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
FirePro S9300 X2
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
FirePro S9300 X2
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
FirePro S9300 X2
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
FirePro S9300 X2
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
FirePro S9300 X2
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

1.11% faster in synthetic tests

More maximum RAM amount (1792 MB vs 4 GB)

Advantages of FirePro S9300 X2

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

More memory bandwidth (512.0 GB/s vs 89.86 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition or FirePro S9300 X2?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition .

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition versus FirePro S9300 X2 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
3.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score