Intel Core i3-1005G1
VS
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Intel Core i3-1005G1
VS
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between Intel Core i3-1005G1 vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between Intel Core i3-1005G1 vs  AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

1.20 GHz
Frequency
2.10 GHz
2
CPU Cores
4
3.40 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
3.50 GHz
3.40 GHz
Turbo (2 Cores)
Yes
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking
No
Turbo (4 Cores)
2.10 GHz

CPU generation and family

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner - Intel Core i3-1005G1 vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. 

Intel UHD Graphics (Ice Lake G1)
GPU name
AMD Radeon Vega 6 Graphics
0.30 GHz
GPU frequency
1.10 GHz
0.90 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
11
Generation
8
12
DirectX Version
12
64
Execution units
6
512
Shader
384
--
Max. Memory
2 GB
3
Max. displays
3
10 nm
Technology
14 nm
Q3/2019
Release date
Q1/2018

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

Decode / Encode
h264
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
h265 8bit
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
h265 10bit
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
VP8
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
VP9
Decode / Encode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
AVC
Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733
Memory type
DDR4-2400
64 GB
Max. Memory
2
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
Yes
3.0
PCIe version
3.0
16
PCIe lanes
12

Encryption

Data encryption support

Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Memory & AMP; PCIe

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.

15 W
TDP
15 W
100 °C
Tjunction max.
105 °C
--
TDP up
35 W
13 W
TDP down
12 W

Technical details

4
CPU Threads
4
4.00 MB
L3-Cache
4.00 MB
10nm
Technology
12 nm
Ice Lake U
Architecture
Picasso (Zen+)
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
BGA 1526, FCBGA1526
Socket
FP5
Q3/2019
Release date
Q1/2019
ca. 281 $
Market price
64-bit
Instruction set (ISA)
1.00 MB
L2-Cache

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

Microsoft Surface Pro 7, PC/Client/Tablet
Used in
Unknown

Compatibility

Technologies and extensions

Virtualization technologies

Memory specs

Peripherals

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

This synthetic test will help you determine the real computing power of a single core in the central processing unit. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and employs various testing scenarios

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 carries out simultaneous cross-platform tests on all the processor’s cores. By running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will reveal all the potential of your Intel or AMD single-unit processor

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms. Cinebench R15 is used for single-core processor performance benchmark test. The hyperthreading ability doesn't count. It is the updated version of Cinebench 11.5. As all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing. The test produces precise and accurate results. This benchmark is the updated version of the Cinebench 11.5 which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. It is the software used to create 3D forms. The benchmark runs for single-core test procedure without counting of hyperthreading ability.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is the new version of the benchmark which is developed on the basis of Cinebench R15 (both versions are operated on the basis of Cinema 4 - the most popular 3D modeling software). Cinebench R20 is used for multi-core processor performance benchmark tests and hyperthreading ability.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is the benchmark for Intel and AMD 64-bit processors. It employs a new power estimation system for a single CPU core. This software carries out the modeling of real scenarios to provide accurate results

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 benchmark supports AMD and Intel multi-core processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows obtaining the real comparative CPU potential

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit. Completely new algorithms provide the quite accurate benchmark testing results of the single-core CPU.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor. Here the hyperthreading ability is counted.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests). Please note that data can differ from the real-world situations.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors. The result is the estimated computing power in the Single-Precision FP32 mode