HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
VS
Intel Core i7-1160G7
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
VS
Intel Core i7-1160G7

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs Intel Core i7-1160G7? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs  Intel Core i7-1160G7. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

2.04 GHz
Frequency
2.10 GHz
8
CPU Cores
4
3.13 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
4.40 GHz
No
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
no data
Turbo (4 Cores)
3.60 GHz
2.54 GHz
Turbo (8 Cores)
hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
Core architecture
normal
1x Cortex-A77
A core
0x
3x Cortex-A77
B core
0x
4x Cortex-A55
C core
no data

CPU generation and family

HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
Name
no data
Mobile
Segment
no data
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
CPU group
no data
HiSilicon Kirin
Family
no data
8
Generation
no data
--
Predecessor
no data
--
Successor
no data

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner - HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs Intel Core i7-1160G7. 

ARM Mali-G78 MP22
GPU name
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Tiger Lake G7)
0.76 GHz
GPU frequency
0.40 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
1.10 GHz
Vallhall 2
Generation
12
12
DirectX Version
12
22
Execution units
96
352
Shader
768
no data
Max. Memory
16 GB
1
Max. displays
3
5 nm
Technology
10 nm
Q4/2020
Release date
Q3/2020
--
Max. GPU Memory

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

Decode / Encode
h264
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
VP8
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
VP9
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
AVC
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
Decode / Encode
Decode
AV1
Decode

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

LPDDR4X-2133 LPDDR5-2750
Memory type
LPDDR4X-4266
Max. Memory
32 GB
4
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
No
PCIe version
4.0
PCIe lanes
16

Encryption

Data encryption support

No
AES-NI
Yes

Memory & AMP; PCIe

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.

--
Tjunction max.
100 °C
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
7 W
TDP (PL1)
15 W
--
TDP (PL2)
--

Technical details

8
CPU Threads
8
--
L3-Cache
12.00 MB
5 nm
Technology
10 nm
Architecture
Tiger Lake UP4
None
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
N/A
Socket
BGA 1526
Q4/2020
Release date
Q3/2020
x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit)
--
L2-Cache
5.00 MB
--
Part Number

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Compatibility

Technologies and extensions

Virtualization technologies

Memory specs

Peripherals

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit. Completely new algorithms provide the quite accurate benchmark testing results of the single-core CPU.

AnTuTu 8 benchmark

Phones with best AnTuTu scores. These cell phones are the ones that have obtained the highest score in the well-known AnTuTu ranking

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors. The result is the estimated computing power in the Single-Precision FP32 mode