AMD 3020e
VS
Intel Celeron N4000
AMD 3020e
VS
Intel Celeron N4000

Which to select

It is time to pick the winner. What is the difference between AMD 3020e vs Intel Celeron N4000? What CPU is more powerful? It is quite easy to determine – look at comparison table. The processor with more cores/ threads and also with higher frequency is the absolute winner!

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Who will win between AMD 3020e vs  Intel Celeron N4000. The general performance of a CPU can easily be determined based on the number of its cores and the thread count, as well as the base frequency and Turbo frequency. The more GHz and cores a CPU has, the better. Please note that high technical specs require using a powerful cooling system.

1.20 GHz
Frequency
1.10 GHz
2
CPU Cores
2
2.60 GHz
Turbo (1 Core)
2.60 GHz
1.80 GHz
Turbo (2 Cores)
2.60 GHz
Yes
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking
No
normal
Core architecture
no data
--
A core
no data
--
B core
no data
--
C core
no data

CPU generation and family

AMD 3020e
Name
no data
Mobile
Segment
no data
AMD 3000e
CPU group
no data
AMD E
Family
no data
4
Generation
no data
--
Predecessor
no data
--
Successor
no data

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphic chips, such a solution being especially popular in laptops. The higher the clock frequency of a GPU is and the bigger its memory, the better. Find a winner - AMD 3020e vs Intel Celeron N4000. 

AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
GPU name
Intel UHD Graphics 600
1.00 GHz
GPU frequency
0.20 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
0.65 GHz
8
Generation
9.5
12
DirectX Version
12
3
Execution units
12
192
Shader
96
Max. Memory
8 GB
3
Max. displays
3
14 nm
Technology
14 nm
Q1/2018
Release date
Q4/2017
2 GB
Max. GPU Memory
no data

Hardware codec support

Here we deal with specs that are used by some CPU manufacturers. These numbers are mainly technical and can be neglected for the purpose of the comparison analysis.

Decode / Encode
h264
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode / Encode
h265 8bit
Decode / Encode
h265 10bit
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
VP8
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
VP9
Decode / Encode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
AVC
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
no data
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
no data
No
AV1
no data

Memory & PCIe

These are memory standards supported by CPUs. The higher such standards, the better a CPU’s performance is.

Memory type
DDR4-2400 LPDDR4-2400
Max. Memory
8 GB
Memory channels
2
ECC
No
PCIe version
2.0
PCIe lanes
6

Encryption

Data encryption support

Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Memory & AMP; PCIe

DDR4-2400
Memory type
no data
32 GB
Max. Memory
no data
Yes
ECC
no data
2
Memory channels
no data
3.0
PCIe version
no data
8
PCIe lanes
no data

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP), sometimes called thermal design point, is the maximum amount of heat generated by a computer chip or component (often a CPU, GPU or system on a chip) that the cooling system in a computer is designed to dissipate under any workload.

TDP
6 W
105 °C
Tjunction max.
--
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
6 W
TDP (PL1)
no data
--
TDP (PL2)
no data

Technical details

4
CPU Threads
2
4.00 MB
L3-Cache
4.00 MB
14 nm
Technology
14 nm
Dali (Zen)
Architecture
Gemini Lake
AMD-V, SVM
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
FT5
Socket
BGA 1090
Q1/2020
Release date
Q4/2017
x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
no data
1.00 MB
L2-Cache
no data
--
Part Number
no data
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
ISA extensions
no data

Devices using this processor

You probably know already what devices use CPUs. These can be a desktop or a laptop.

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Compatibility

Technologies and extensions

Virtualization technologies

Memory specs

Peripherals

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

This synthetic test will help you determine the real computing power of a single core in the central processing unit. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and employs various testing scenarios

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 carries out simultaneous cross-platform tests on all the processor’s cores. By running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will reveal all the potential of your Intel or AMD single-unit processor

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms. Cinebench R15 is used for single-core processor performance benchmark test. The hyperthreading ability doesn't count. It is the updated version of Cinebench 11.5. As all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing. The test produces precise and accurate results. This benchmark is the updated version of the Cinebench 11.5 which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is the benchmark for Intel and AMD 64-bit processors. It employs a new power estimation system for a single CPU core. This software carries out the modeling of real scenarios to provide accurate results

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 benchmark supports AMD and Intel multi-core processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows obtaining the real comparative CPU potential

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit. Completely new algorithms provide the quite accurate benchmark testing results of the single-core CPU.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor. Here the hyperthreading ability is counted.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests). Please note that data can differ from the real-world situations.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors. The result is the estimated computing power in the Single-Precision FP32 mode